Alexander Stasinski wrote:
> I created a symbolic link between libc.so.5 and libc.so.6, but my
> problem remained. How did you solve that initlever 5-problem?
# ln -s libc.so.6 libc.so.5 # or was it other way round? I keep
forgetting.
# ldconfig -v | less # to check if everything went OK, and it did with
me. reboot would also help since ldconfig is done at startup, but that
would be too much like M$, wouldn't it? :)
# lyx
As for initlevel, I had no trouble, as well as no idea why would such
a thing happen. Say, if the substituted libc 6 works as libc 5, should
the problem not disappear? I am not sure, of course, just taking a best
guess.
--
Filip Miletic - Linux Users Group of Yugoslavia (LUGY)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://galeb.etf.bg.ac.yu/~filmil
LUGY http://www.linux.org.yu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
+++ the lyx project user mailing list +++
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the **Subject** unsubscribe.
