Hi
I will do what you say and send the results to you (JMarc) tonight. I
will also show you 6.1 requirements from the binaries I obtained. Would
it be better to send the logs to you directly or to the list? I
_believe_ in debugging scripts and logs; it is too easy to
misscommunicate when people (including myself) describe what happens. I
learned this fact long ago when I was an electronics tech in the Navy;
even the most highly trained people would make
mistakes/misrepresentation/oversights when trying to describe problems.
I found out that I did as well.
BTW: did you know that your email is reaching me twice?
Ray
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I know nothing about the glibc2.1 or Suse things. However, what I
> would try to do is
> rpm -e xforms
> to remove the old xforms installation, and then
> rpm -i xforms-0.88-2.i386.rpm
> to install the new one. The problem is that, since the version numbers
> of the rpms clash, the rpm tool might decide that update is not
> necessary.
>
> As far as version is concerned, you can use
> rpm -qi xforms
> to see the date of packaging of the different rpms.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> JMarc
