>>>>> "Raymond" == Raymond E Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raymond> Hi I will do what you say and send the results to you (JMarc)
Raymond> tonight. I will also show you 6.1 requirements from the
Raymond> binaries I obtained. Would it be better to send the logs to
Raymond> you directly or to the list? I _believe_ in debugging
Raymond> scripts and logs; it is too easy to misscommunicate when
Raymond> people (including myself) describe what happens.
Yes, please send all details which seem relevent to the list. Do not
send them only to me since I do not know much about things newer than
redhat 5.2, so other people might be more helpful than I am.
Raymond> I learned
Raymond> this fact long ago when I was an electronics tech in the
Raymond> Navy; even the most highly trained people would make
Raymond> mistakes/misrepresentation/oversights when trying to describe
Raymond> problems. I found out that I did as well.
This is indeed a common problem...
Raymond> BTW: did you know that your email is reaching me twice?
So does yours :) It is because we are both too lazy to edit the to:
and cc: fields of our message to remove duplicate addresses (in this
case lyx-users plus our personnal address)...
JMarc
