Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch) wrote: > On 10/22/2018 04:16 AM, Pol wrote: >> >> A possible improvement of the spellchecker facility: Common, typical >> mispellings made by authors could be istantaneously autocorrected by >> lyx, by checking a suitable list maintained by authors themseves. > But if I know that I never intend to type “satistics” then why would I > still do it so often that the ordinary find-and-replace function > weren't sufficient to fix the occasional lapse?
Only for practicl reasons. It is easier to replace wrong words automatically. There are several words that i frequntly type wronglyi every few lines, p.
