On 10/23/2018 05:41 AM, Pol wrote:
Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch) wrote:
On 10/22/2018 04:16 AM, Pol wrote:
A possible improvement of the spellchecker facility: Common,
typical mispellings made by authors could be istantaneously
autocorrected by lyx, by checking a suitable list maintained
by authors themseves.
But if I know that I never intend to type “satistics” then why would I
still do it so often that the ordinary find-and-replace function
weren't sufficient to fix the occasional lapse?
Only for practicl reasons. It is easier to replace wrong words
automatically.
There are several words that i frequntly type wronglyi every few lines,
You've not answered my actual question. A feature of the sort that
you propose is not likely to be popular; the vast majority of people
would, in constructing the underlying look-up table, find themselves
learning not to make the mistakes in the first place.
