Cause I am old.  Habit over 20 years or more with lovely lyx.

I don't see a Lualatex in the export menu.  I see pdf (luatex), which I am 
using on 
my 2.3.2 lyx version, and latex (luatex) which I have never tried.  

I like Noto Serif too. If you get the chance, please tell your friend that 
italicized Noto 
serif text prints as regular (non-italicized text) when exported via pdf 
(luatex) using 
Koma script article on my Debian stretch machine.  Italics are not lost when, 
all else 
being the same, I switch from Noto serif to new century schoolbook. 

John 

On Friday, July 5, 2019 11:42:43 PM PDT Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> Why would one ever use pdf2pdf?
> 
> Lualatex (pdf5) generates proper PDF.
> 
> I haven't encountered the italic issue, but if I can verify it I will take
> it up with the package maintainer. You can take any font you like, and if
> New Century Schoolbook 14 works, use that. I just happen to like Noto :-)-O
> 
> el
> 
> 
> --
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
> On 5 Jul 2019, 19:51 +0200, John White <[email protected]>, wrote:
> […]
> 
> > > As an experiment, I typed two sentences from an actual opinion of our
> > > Court
> > > (presuming it uses its own rules) and compared them to the lyx pdf
> > > version,
> > > using 14pt custom with koma script article and 12pt base with regular
> > > article class and it is clear that the 12pt base is too small. However,
> > > the font the Court uses is slightly smaller than the koma-script 14. As
> > > the rule says 14pt "or larger" I think I will stick with your
> > > koma-script
> > > 14pt, even if I have to trash a two or three paragraphs of my amazing
> > > prose.
> > > 
> > > Thanks again!
> > 
> > I note that when using noto serif font exports to pdf (lautex) I lose some
> > formatting, e.g. italics are lost. And exporting noto serif to pdf2pdf
> > looks a little big. So I used New Century School book exported to pdf
> > (Pdf2pdf) which seems slightly better (less big) than when using century
> > school book and exporting to lautex pdf. This font business is confusing.
> > John
> > 
> > > > --------

Reply via email to