>>From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: math environments
>>To: "Jean-Pierre.Chretien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 09:05:52 +0200 (CEST)
>>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Does \mbox{$...$} come in the list ?
>>
>>No. Should it?
>>
>>The list is for things that mathed needs to read "unexpectedly".
>>The \mbox{$...$} should appear in an \newcommand definition, so we are
>>prepared somehow (although I am not sure whether it would work right now)
>>
>>But that reminds me that "native" \mbox support would be nice, wouldn't it?
That's related to the fact that (La)TeX math has a re-entering structure
which allows getting indefinitely (hm, to the stack size) in and out
of math mode, which is not possible in mathed.
What would be "native" \mbox support ? Doing the same in mathed, i.e.
having normal text blocks which could in turn include mathed blocks ?
I take the opportunity of this discussion tu stress again
the importance of a personal math panel in which you could pick up
math constructs (in fact macros) already used, because it is highly
related to the possibility to patch math constructs in mathed mode.
Is this currently in development ?
--
Jean-Pierre
