On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:07:26PM +0200, Steffen Seufert wrote: > I don't think it's an update problem, because the problem > exists on my system, too. > > I searched the archive about this problem: > > Is it possible that it's caused by some optimizing compiling > options of gcc as mentioned earlier? It is possible. > If it's so, how can the source made robust to be protected > about this "optimizations"? It is possible to disable compiler optimization if the compiler is gcc 2.96 (but recent versions of gcc 2.96 work correctly, so people with older version should really upgrade).
- problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex Beyer, Marcus
- Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex Beyer, Marcus
- Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex Beyer, Marcus
- Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex Beyer, Marcus
- Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex Dekel Tsur
- Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex Dekel Tsur
- Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex John Levon
- RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex Beyer, Marcus
- Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex Dekel Tsur
