What it does correctly:
* cf references [4,5,8]
* the numbering in the bibliography section.
what it doesn't do correctly (or rather, what I want it to do):
* the numbering of the references.
I do
cf ref: [these_cedric]
and there is an autogenerated reference numbering.
It is this autonumbering that is the problem. I have two references on page 1,
and the autonumbering gives them the numbers 6 and 3. I would like that to be 1
and 2.
If I only used the bibliography-style I would have changed the biblio sequence,
but now I use bibtex, and I don't understand how it does it autonumbering.
And I have made an example file with the problem which I have attached
I want ref 2 -> 1
ref 3 -> 2
ref 4 -> 3
and ref 1 -> 4
Just so that thes is some logic in the numbering of the references.
don't you know this problem? It seems like a thing most people would experience
mo
On 26-Jul-2001 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2001 17:48 schrieb morten:
>> I have removed the 'babel'-reference under preferences and I include
>> the 'cite' package. but no effect.
>> so.. any other suggestions?
>> morten
>
> Just to exclude misunderstandings: what is exactly your problem? Do the
> cites appear in the wrong order in the text (i.e. the labels) as:
> "This is described by [3,1,7,5]"
> or do they appear in the wrong order in the bibliography as:
> [3] Johnson et al ...
> [1] Smith...
>
> The cite package corrects only the first of this problems, for the
> latter, it's a matter of the bibstyle you are using.
>
> Greets,
> Jürgen
--
----------------------------------
E-Mail: morten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 26-Jul-2001
Time: 18:03:50
Currently working hard for the LAI at INSA-lyon
----------------------------------
project.bib
bibtesttest.lyx
