yes and no...
My first ref. is 'Prelle' and the second is 'Ohno' .....
but say I want to define another numbering scheme. Do you have a link or an
easy of doing that?
mo
On 26-Jul-2001 J�rgen Spitzm�ller wrote:
> Hello Morten,
>
> You want bibtex to give your references the number as they appear in
> the text [1] for the first reference, [2] for the second.
> But bibtex uses (by default) another scheme: The references are ordered
> alphabetically in the Bibliography and numberend then, so:
>
> [1] Adams...
> comes before
> [2] Bart...
>
> That's the standard and the referneces in the text are using this
> number scheme, too (of course).
>
> But, anyway, you can use an unsorted bibstyle like unsrt.bst and you
> will get what you want.
> But NOTE: the bibliography will _not_ be alphabetically then (of
> course).
>
> Hope this solves your problem,
>
> J�rgen
>
> Am Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2001 18:22 schrieb morten:
>> What it does correctly:
>> * cf references [4,5,8]
>> * the numbering in the bibliography section.
>>
>> what it doesn't do correctly (or rather, what I want it to do):
>> * the numbering of the references.
>> I do
>> cf ref: [these_cedric]
>> and there is an autogenerated reference numbering.
>> It is this autonumbering that is the problem. I have two references
>> on page 1, and the autonumbering gives them the numbers 6 and 3. I
>> would like that to be 1 and 2.
>>
>> If I only used the bibliography-style I would have changed the biblio
>> sequence, but now I use bibtex, and I don't understand how it does it
>> autonumbering.
>>
>> And I have made an example file with the problem which I have
>> attached I want ref 2 -> 1
>> ref 3 -> 2
>> ref 4 -> 3
>> and ref 1 -> 4
>> Just so that thes is some logic in the numbering of the references.
>>
>> don't you know this problem? It seems like a thing most people would
>> experience mo
>>
>> On 26-Jul-2001 J�rgen Spitzm�ller wrote:
>> > Am Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2001 17:48 schrieb morten:
>> >> I have removed the 'babel'-reference under preferences and I
>> >> include the 'cite' package. but no effect.
>> >> so.. any other suggestions?
>> >> morten
>> >
>> > Just to exclude misunderstandings: what is exactly your problem? Do
>> > the cites appear in the wrong order in the text (i.e. the labels)
>> > as: "This is described by [3,1,7,5]"
>> > or do they appear in the wrong order in the bibliography as:
>> > [3] Johnson et al ...
>> > [1] Smith...
>> >
>> > The cite package corrects only the first of this problems, for the
>> > latter, it's a matter of the bibstyle you are using.
>> >
>> > Greets,
>> > J�rgen
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream; charset="iso-8859-1";
> name="project.bib"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-Description: project.bib
> ----------------------------------------
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream; charset="iso-8859-1";
> name="bibtesttest.lyx"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-Description: bibtesttest.lyx
> ----------------------------------------
>
> --
>
> erbprinzenstr. 6
> 79098 freiburg
> tel.: 0761/ 29 21 768
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
----------------------------------
E-Mail: morten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 26-Jul-2001
Time: 18:51:01
Currently working hard for the LAI at INSA-lyon
----------------------------------
