On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Mate Wierdl wrote: [...] > --- If you want virus prevention via filters, you may want to > implement it on your end. It is much less riskier than > implementing it on my end. Indeed, I do not know of any filters > that would not do false positives. > > If you implement it, make sure the message containing a virus is not > bounced back to sender but simply discarded. [...] > Viruses are just one of our problems: spam is the other. I can safely > say that the only way to tackle both if we implement one of the two > methods I described in my previous email. So we have to make the usual > choice between security and convenience.
MIMEDefang http://www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang It's GPL'd and we use it here. I haven't any experience with setting it up but does filter the viruses out and can be set to filter other stuff also. Allan. (ARRae)
