On Monday 15 July 2002 15:29, Kevin Page wrote: > > Cann't they already? > > It didn't seem to "just work". Looking at the test, this isn't really > a problem, just because the fileref wasn't to the actual file (which > could be fixed by hand). As for rendering figure reference numbers, I > guess this is down to the docbook rendering tools (but they didn't > come out when previewed from lyx).
Ok. > > I need to work this more since, as an example, pybibliographer also > > exports > > docbook. > > Hmm, I'd never come across pybibliographer before; it looks > interesting. > > > Send me an example file, please. > > I quickly knocked up an example in lyx the other day. I then exported > as SGML and passed it to db2ps (part of the docbook-utils RedHat > package), but it didn't work. I'll mail you the file off list. There were some markup missing. Take as an example the author field, it should be author: <firstname>F</firstname><surname>D</surname> > > It depends, what do you want/need? > > If we now that maybe we can point you to the different solutions... > > In reality, I don't currently have the time to fix/debug features or > run an unstable version from CVS. I have one of those dealine things > to meet :( > I'm quite happy to accept that DocBook support isn't quite there yet, > and carry on with latex output (which might be what I ended up using > for rendering anyway - there's a fairly specific style I need to use). If you say that you have a deadline then go with the process that you know best. Believe me, I am talking by experience. ;-) > However, I'd still like to make the switch to docbook eventually, so > once current pressures have passed I should be back to have another > go. I am glad to hear that. :-) > Regards, > > kev -- Jos� Ab�lio
