On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> > Yes, S stands for shift, and ~S stands for "don't worry about shift".
>
> Maybe I'm tired today... didn't see the '~' there. I've put some notes
> on this here:
>
> http://ev-en.org/wiki/moin.cgi/LyxKeyboardBindings
>
Some testing showed that:
"C-a" is equivalent to "C-A"
and
"C-S-a" is equivalent to "C-S-A"
and the order of the "modifiers" doesn't matter either, so:
"C-S-a" is equivalent to "S-C-a"
Furthermore, the last binding seem to override previous bindings, i.e.
\bind "C-a" "self-insert a"
\bind "C-A" "self-insert A"
means that pressing "C-a" will insert a 'A' (since "C-a" and "C-A" are
equivalent).
The '~S' modifier seems to be an exception to overriding previous
key bindings. Having only this binding:
\bind "C-~S-a" "self-insert a"
means that both "C-a" and "C-S-a" will insert a 'a'. However, in this
case:
\bind "C-a" "self-insert a"
\bind "C-S-A" "self-insert A"
\bind "C-~S-a" "self-insert b"
pressing "C-a" -> 'a' so "C-S-A" -> "A". The binding "C-~S-a" is never
activated. If one of the previous bindings are removed, i.e.
\bind "C-S-A" "self-insert A"
\bind "C-~S-a" "self-insert b"
then "C-a" -> 'A' and "C-S-a" -> b. So bindings with the modifier "~S"
doesn't seem to override previous bindings.
Anyway, I put these notes here:
>
> http://ev-en.org/wiki/moin.cgi/LyxKeyboardBindings
for the future.
/Chrstian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
