Owen Lucas wrote:
> Yep Paul is right. There may be some extra latex options that you can
> use to get it cited in diferent ways. These can be seen in the .sty or
> bst file associated with the reference format. They generally look like
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@fcitenam}%
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> }
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@fciteasn}}%
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> }
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> lyx as standard puts \cite{my_book}. In ERT you may be able to put
> something like \citeasnoun{my_book}. From the GUI boxes in lyx it looks
> like the option to select these diferent types is coming but I assume
> since diferent reference formats have some what diferent commands its
> hard to smoothly impliment.
>
> For the style I use \cite{my_book} puts (Lucas, 2002) and
> \citeasnoun{my_book} as Lucas (2002). In effect I have it the other way
> round for what you want.
>
>
> cheers
> Owen
>
>
> Paul Medwell wrote:
>> A possible solution (not necessarily the best one) is to look at the
>> contents of the files you downloaded...they often have a description of
>> the various styles available somewhere near the top. If not, without
>> needing to be a supergenious, you should be able to read through them
>> and roughly sort it out.
>>
>> If you manage to find the key for the style you want, you might then
>> need to insert it with ERT. The style that I use gives options in the
>> GUI citation window (its probably called something better than that),
>> but unless I use an ERT, these options don't actually change the way the
>> citation displays - just something to bear in mind.
>>
>> Hope this is of some help.
>>
>> Lata,
>> Paul
>>
>> --
>> "Tim J. Garrett" wrote:
>>
>>>Hello all.
>>>
>>>Hoping someone can help with this.
>>>
>>>With some kind help from Martin Vermeer, I have successfully managed to
>>>install my favorite journal's sty cls and bst files, combined with a
>>>.layout file previously developed. This is all great, and it works pretty
>>>much beautifully, except for one major thing:
>>>
>>>My journal of choice (AGU) has two ways of putting citations in text that
>>>are undoubtedly included in the .bst file from their website (at least
>>>they show up in the actual publications). For example:
>>>
>>>Twomey [1959] gave an approximate analytical solution for.....
>>>
>>>vs.
>>>
>>>An approximate analytical solution exists [Twomey, 1959] that.....
>>>
>>>Currently if I enter a citation reference using the bibtex window, only
>>>the first format shows in the dvi, and there is no apparent option for
>>>having a citation reference exist using the second format.
>>>
>>>This issue has cropped up a couple of times in this list, based on a
>>>simple search, but I haven't seen a solution. Is there one?
We support natbib natively. To support \citeasnoun etc would require an
abstraction that I hadn't considered when I wrote the code.
Could you send me an example lyx file so that I can mull the problem over?
--
Angus
