[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@fcitenam}% [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@fciteasn}}% [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lyx as standard puts \cite{my_book}. In ERT you may be able to put something like \citeasnoun{my_book}. From the GUI boxes in lyx it looks like the option to select these diferent types is coming but I assume since diferent reference formats have some what diferent commands its hard to smoothly impliment.
For the style I use \cite{my_book} puts (Lucas, 2002) and \citeasnoun{my_book} as Lucas (2002). In effect I have it the other way round for what you want.
cheers Owen
Paul Medwell wrote:
A possible solution (not necessarily the best one) is to look at the contents of the files you downloaded...they often have a description of the various styles available somewhere near the top. If not, without needing to be a supergenious, you should be able to read through them and roughly sort it out.
If you manage to find the key for the style you want, you might then need to insert it with ERT. The style that I use gives options in the GUI citation window (its probably called something better than that), but unless I use an ERT, these options don't actually change the way the citation displays - just something to bear in mind.
Hope this is of some help.
Lata, Paul
-- "Tim J. Garrett" wrote:
Hello all.
Hoping someone can help with this.
With some kind help from Martin Vermeer, I have successfully managed to install my favorite journal's sty cls and bst files, combined with a .layout file previously developed. This is all great, and it works pretty much beautifully, except for one major thing:
My journal of choice (AGU) has two ways of putting citations in text that are undoubtedly included in the .bst file from their website (at least they show up in the actual publications). For example:
Twomey [1959] gave an approximate analytical solution for.....
vs.
An approximate analytical solution exists [Twomey, 1959] that.....
Currently if I enter a citation reference using the bibtex window, only the first format shows in the dvi, and there is no apparent option for having a citation reference exist using the second format.
This issue has cropped up a couple of times in this list, based on a simple search, but I haven't seen a solution. Is there one?
Thankyou
Tim --
