On Friday 14 November 2003 00:42, John O'Gorman wrote: > > I will try the same things on a Redhat 9 system. (Most things I try on > SuSE seem to go wrong!).
Ok. > On the topic of linuxdoc Jose', I am considering doing the documentation > for the Aubit4GL project. They would like it available as linuxdoc (man, > info, etc). So article(linuxdoc) is an obvious choice. In your opinion, > would it be practical for me to > > 1. Write my primary documents in LyX as article so I can get the > typesetting that pleases me, but confine myself to the subset of > environments that article(linuxdoc) supports. > > 2. Write a conversion script to produce a linucdoc version of the Lyx > file, and hence produce, man, info, etc versions. Linuxdoc supports most of the basic features, the only exceptions are tables and figures in 1.3.x. That is fixed in 1.4.0cvs What needs do you have that are not satisfied with present lyx linuxdoc? > best regards > John O'Gorman -- Jos� Ab�lio LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
