On 20.09.04, Herbert Voss wrote:
> G. Milde wrote:
> >On 17.09.04, Helge Hafting wrote:
> >> ... would it be ok to simply replace pslatex with the better
> >> alternative,
> >> or would we get angry protests from:
> >> * People who have pslatex but not the alternative (if any)
> >> * People who want their old documents to appear just so, and object
> >> to anything that changes fonts in _existing_ documents?
> >
> >Keep pslatex but put it in a lower position. This way it is clear not to be
> >first choice but will still be used for existing documents.
> >
> >Changing fonts can be a big issue and it could become a long cumbersome
> >search to find out why my carefully crafted page layout got completely out
> >of sync.
>
> nonsense here! Look what pslatex loads and compare it with
> the replacement, which I posted more than once.
I just compared Document>Font pslatex with
Document>Font Default + preamble \usepackage{lmodern}
The translated document has 32 vs. 30 pages and floats appear at totally
different positions. An automatic replacement would break my docs.
I would object to documents defining Font pslatex to be typeset with lmodern
automatically.
However, I would like lmodern to appear in the drop down list and I would
like it to appear at first position.
G�nter
--
G.Milde web.de
