Matej Cepl writes: > No, it shouldn't be certainly included in LyX. I do not think it is a > good idea to fix broken distribution by bundling it all together with > LyX (have you heard about "do one thing, and do it perfectly" > principle?). Will you expect LyX maintainers to maintain it, so they > have something to do in their plenty of spare time?
:-) (Yeah, I almost added the words "in a perfect world" to my original post) But it is listed (though inactive) in the menu. So I should modify my previous post to say "in a perfect world with a dozen full-time LyX programmers I would suggest that such things be simply a part of LyX (whether compiled in or as script in the library). Anything that supports LyX's goals of "break[ing] the obsolete tradition of the 'typewriter paradigm'" (i.e. "count your spaces, find your errors yourself") and becoming an even better document preparation system should be considered (time and resources permitting, of course). Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: > There is a similar utility named 'lacheck'. Is it bundled on more > distributions? If it is we could think about modifying our code to > understand this. Yeah, I saw that in the SuSE distro I believe. -K -- Kevin Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tiros-Translations
