You can just put some ERT there, too. Even a LaTeX comment: %whatever. It's true that there should be a better way.
Richard Adrian Robson wrote: > I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) > in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single > definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything > works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way > to do this? > -- ================================================================== Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown University http://bobjweil.com/heck/ ================================================================== Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at: http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
