Stacia Hartleben wrote: > It seems that I have > misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask in all > honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the point of going > through all this trouble to make LyX unicode compatible if it well, > doesn't work with the majority of unicode text? For me the unicode > text displays in LyX fine (with a few quirks) so I was mislead I > guess.
I guess the problem is that we have to face LaTeX's limitations. If some languages need extra packages even with unicode input encoding (to *output* unicode properly), we have to add support for those packages by and by. Unicode might be nice, but it cannot do magic. Jürgen
