On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 04:17:31PM +0200, Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
> Tim Michelsen schrieb am 31.05.2007:
>
> >Hello,
> >I am writing a text with the class "report (koma-script)".
>
> >I am having the following problem:
>
> >When I add an appendix all
> >numerations will have a ending point added.
>
> >I found the problem with the option "pointednumbers" in koma script.
> >(see p. 47:
> >ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/scrguien.pdf)
> >
> >
>
> >According to the documentation and German grammar rules normal sections
> >with numbers should not have a point whereas appendices should have one:
> >1 first section
> >2 second section
> >A. Appendix
> >B. AppendixB
>
> This is inconsistent and wrong. The 1996 Duden says (R4): "Bei der
> Abschnittsgliederung *mit Ziffern und Buchstaben* steht der Punkt nach
> römischen und arabischen Zahlen und nach Großbuchstaben." i.e. the dot
> has to be after numbers *and* letters, if there is an appendix. I cannot
> find this rule in the 2004 Duden (23. Auflage), though.
It certainly look wrong.
1. first section
2. second section
A Appendix
B AppendixB
looks ok-ish, biutn certainlyh not the other way round.
I'd prefer the completely dotless version in any case.
Andre'
