Hi, I hope I'm not sounding "pushy" but isn't rc2 overdue? IMHO it would be more efficient to test the current status instead of stumbling over "fixedintrunk" bugs again and again. Currently it seems to me that many known and/or fixed bugs are reported again and again, which in turn may induce some people (like me) not to report (minor) issues anymore. As a consequence, this way some bugs may go unnoticed.
If the reason is that rc2 is scheduled to be the last rc, then I would ask: why not simply add a rc3 to the plan? I don't see any disadvantages of having more than two rc's, or am I missing something. thanks, sven
