Mike
Call me silly, but I thought that the point of LaTeX was to remove
the author from this kind of formatting and leave that up to the
pro's. I don't think that it would be wise to enable just anyone to
crank out a sty file or layout without understanding the underlying
architecture of the LyX and LaTeX systems and the reasoning why
things are the way they are. I don't think that giving someone with
minimal experience in the subject the ability to dabble in typography
is really good idea. Even LyX requires this kind of implicit
understanding of LaTeX to do all but the simplest of projects. I
don't know about the reset of the community, but before I let LyX do
anything I make sure that I understand the actual LaTeX code that it
is generating and how to do the same thing long hand in a LaTeX
editor before I trust what is going on. I just don't feel that
something as critical as styles and layouts should be relegated to
the same "black box" status as they are in Word. If people want to
make styles and layouts then they should be required to put in the
work to learn to do it right and why things are done the way they are
by the pro's.
- Template based style builder tools? Steve Litt
- Re: Template based style builder tools? Michael Anderson
- Re: Template based style builder tools? Steve Litt
- Re: Template based style builder tools? Michael Anderson
- Re: Template based style builder tools? Mael Hilléreau
- Re: Template based style builder tools? Michael Anderson
- Re: Template based style builder tools? Mael Hilléreau
- Re: Template based style builder to... Declan O'Byrne
- Re: Template based style builde... Steve Litt
- Re: Template based style builde... Typhoon
- Re: Template based style bu... Declan O'Byrne
- Re: Template based style bu... Typhoon
