On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Rex C. Eastbourne wrote:

www.lyx.org. I'd like to get some feedback so we know what people think looks best. Here are some links to some other websites with designs that all look nice, although there's a wide range in their design style.

Hi Rex,

I asked my girlfriend who has some experience in this matter for her input, here are her impressions (she added slashdot to the list) in a grade where 5 is the best. Unfortunately she didn't think any of the sites were great, so none of them got full marks...

            Look and feel   Navigation  Useability   Overall
www.lyx.org     1               1           1           1
wiki.lyx.org    2               2           2           2
Octave          1               2           3           1
Emacs           1               1           1           1
Python          2               3           3           3
Ruby            4               2           2           3
SciPy           3               3           3           3
Slashdot        4               4           4           4

* "Look and feel" means the level of design

* "Navigation" means how easy they are to navigate, and how easy it is to
  see where you are (within the site). Also how intuitivie navigation is.

* "Useability" means e.g. that a small number of clicks is needed to
  easily reach your desitnation. Do you have to scroll?
  Do you have to look for the links on the page, or do you see them at
  once? Do you need more than three clicks to reach your destination?

* "Overall" means the overall impression of the site. Does it look
  professional?

In other words, her spontaneous reaction to the original www.lyx.org and the wiki is that they currently suck. Guess I should be glad that the wiki wasn't worst at least... Slashdot got some good comments from her though.

cheers,
Christian

http://www.slashdot.org

http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/
http://www.python.org/
http://www.scipy.org/
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44               http://www.md.kth.se/~chr

Reply via email to