Pavel Sanda <[email protected]> writes: > i had the feeling that we try to avoid direct touching of kernel from gui, > thats why everything in dialogs is passed through lfuns.
My view is that we avoid to do _actions_ dorectly (so that everything can be reproduced through lfuns), but we can query as much as we want. Then there is this goal of reversing the dependency between core and gui, but I do not remember at all what it entails :) > i wasn't even aware be have direct buffer() inside dialog class and it > looks like design flaw. It is nice for the Paragraph dialog to be able to disable the Alignments that are not allowed in some layout, for example. This requires access to the textclass. > it will work, but it would be bit schizophrenic how we get info for the > dialog fields :) What do you mean? > another possibility was to make groups its own object/dialog, but its > bit late in this phase; i have been asking these questions when it was > in design/implementation. Yes, I remember. And nobody had the radically new idea that would make it all feel intuitive :) JMarc
