Am Tuesday 16 June 2009 16:00:05 schrieb Olivier Ripoll: Thanks, Oliver, for clarifying this
Wolfgang > Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > Am Tuesday 16 June 2009 14:08:43 schrieben Sie: > > > > Thanks Uwe, > > > > but do you know why the 575kb sized jpg becomes after > > convertion to .png 2.8MB? > > (i used convert) > > Hi, > > jpeg is more aggressive than png: It compresses more, but destroys the > image a little. png does not produce any artefact. You have no interest > to convert a jpg to a png, because the png image will have the jpeg > artefacts. > You could try to convert your eps to png. > > - if your eps is a vectorial image, then it should not be so big and you > could use it directly or convert it to pdf. > - if your eps contains an photo, then use jpeg. > - if your eps contains an picture, but not a photo (i.e. a non-vectorial > drawing), you may prefer png to avoid jpeg artefacts. > > Best regards, > > Olivier -- --------------------------------- Wolfgang Engelmann Schlossgartenstrasse 22 D-72070 Tübingen Tel 07071 68325
