Dear Stefano, dear list,
thanks again!
Question: is what you just described the behavior you want?
In one case it is ("hier S. xxx)… in the other, without the "hier" it
is not the behaviour I want. I have tried out some more references
now, and in some cases it works, and the "hier…" is added, in some not
– and I could not figure out why it works in some cases and in the
others it does not.
Or is there any more tweak to the footnote format you'd like to see.
Say you are citing from
page 3 of this incollection item:
@INCOLLECTION{Feltz2006a,
author = {Bernard Feltz},
title = {Self-Organization, selection and Emergence in the Theory of
Evolution},
booktitle = {Self-Organization and Emergence in Life Sciences},
pages = {341-360},
publisher = {Springer},
year = {2006},
editor = {Feltz, Bernard and Crommelinck, Marc and Goujon, Philippe},
}
what exactly would like to see in your footnote?
Do you want
(1) Feltz, B. Self-Organization, selection and Emergence in the
Theory of
Evolution Self-Organization and Emergence in Life Sciences,
Springer, 2006,
341-360, hier S. 3
or
(2) Feltz, B. Self-Organization, selection and Emergence in the
Theory of
Evolution Self-Organization and Emergence in Life Sciences,
Springer, 2006, S.
3
Both of these options would be fine, so option (1) is preferable with
Wassenhoven style. But the problem is, that I do not get option (1) in
every case. I used different references with the same style
("incollection") and entered the proper number for each in Lyx´s "text
after"-dialogue. In some cases I get the "hier S. xxx" – which is fine
for me – but in some other cases I just get the same as before I
entered the pagenumber into the "text after"-field, so the "hier S.
xxx" is missing. Why could that behaviour be different in the same
document?
From a quick look at the documentation, the Wassenhoven style give
you the
option (1) as default. The doc says: "This behaviour can be
infuenced by the
option herename, which can take the values ‘true’ or ‘false’; the
standard
value is ‘true’." So set it to 'false' if you do not want the "hier"
word.
I did not set this option, so I have the standard, which is "true".
This is all I have entered in the preamble:
\usepackage[natbib=true,style=authortitle-dw, style=footnote-dw]
{biblatex}
I don't think you can get option (2) without customizing the
Wassenhoven
style, at least I did not see any option for that in the docs. It
seems to be
hardcoded. You may want to ask the author for an option, or get your
hands
dirty and try to modify the \DeclareBibliographyDriver{incollection}
macro of
one of the bbx file Wassenhoven provides (my guess would be
standard-dw.bbx,
but I am not very familiar with this style).
I think that would be too difficult for me, and option (1) would be
really fine…
In the other case i did just the same: I entered the pagenumber of
the
quotation in the citation dialogue, also with the "incollection"-
type.
I can see no difference in what I did, but I get a different result:
Here the pagenumbers of the whole article are displayed, and after
that just the pagenumber, but without the "here…". So the result here
is the same as if I would have put it into Lyx´s text-field directly.
I am not sure what you are referring to here. Was this a different
reference?
The same reference cited a second time?
Well, I mean, that in some cases – where in every instance I do the
same by entering the proper number in the "text after"-field – the
"hier…" is displayed, in others not. I don´t know why, as I don´t see
that I did something diferrent. Even the style ("incollection") is the
same. I hope this is understandable…
Thank you, all the best*
E
