Thanks for processing the bibtex file, but the keys of bibtex entries were modified and I have a huge document and I would not like to manually change all references atleast there are 200 referring places. So I would not like to upgrade to higher versions for due to this issue
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2013/8/20 Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]> > >> > >> Is Julien's test case for #8739 invalid? Or your point is that it is > rare? > > > > > > IMO syntax errors in bst files are not harmless (per se). I would > certainly > > not use a broken bst file for a publication, and if a journal provides a > > broken bst file, I would ask them to fix it. > > > > This is not to say that skipping errors would not be a useful feature, > but > > this does not only apply to bibtex errors. However, if you skip such > errors, > > you should really know what you are doing, so I would not implement such > a > > feature in a very prominent place. > > Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. > > Scott > -- * Aliabbas Petiwala| Phd Scholar|Interdisciplinary Program in Education Technology**|IIT * ** ** *Bombay|+919664867707 | http://home.iitb.ac.in/~aliabbas/*
