2014-03-27 18:51 GMT+01:00 Csikos Bela: > Back to the beamer module and nesting. This is an example workflow: > > 1. I start a frame using/selecting frame. Fill the frame title. Press > enter. > > 2. Write frame content. The style still show 'frame'. Is that normal? >
Yes. The frame is a normal environment and behaves like a normal environment now. > 3. I manually change content to standard style. This results in appearance > another frame > > below content. Is this normal? > No, this is not a "frame". The paragraph is outside the frame (which might be well intended, but usually is not what you want). This is explained in the LyX Beamer manual. However, it is suggested to stick with "frame" instead of using a nested Standard paragraph. This makes things way easier. > 4. I increase depth for content. Content becomes indented and previously > appeared > > frame disappears. Press enter. Style becomes 'frame' again. > No, the style should be still "Standard", but nested in the frame. > 5. I apply style "separator". Frame is ended, new frame appears below. > Better use Edit > New Environment (Frame). More convenient than inserting the separator manually. > > 6. Now I try to insert a subtitle. Move the cursor to the end of title, > press enter. > > 7. Select/apply style 'frame subtitle'. Content below becomes unindented. > I enter frame > > subtitle text. I increase dept for frame subtitle. Content remains > unindented. > > 8. I have to increase depth again for content if I want it to stay part of > the frame. > > That is, inserting a subtitle afterwards, messes the whole frame content, > and I have to > > start over increasing depth. Is this really what we want? > > Or do I do something wrong? > If you enter the subtitle to a frame that already has nested content, it is like this. This is a general problem of nested LyX paragraphs. Would you use Frame instead of nested Standard (as suggested above), things would be easier. If you have to use nested stuff, do it like this: However, this is certainly something that needs some polishing. Jürgen > > Thanks, > > bcsikos > >
