On 23 Oct 1998, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
> AAS> I'm not trying to claim that mathed is the perfect model to
> AAS> follow for the internal buffer structure (after all I wrote it
> AAS> almost 3 years ago). But part of the idea is rougly there, and
> AAS> it seems to work, isn't it?
>
> So does the rest of lyx, so what's the point?
What do you mean, that part of the idea is there (that's not precisely
true) or that it seems to work (that's not the issue of my paragraph).
> Besides the datastructure in mathed is not excactly good...
> (that array I mean)
I know and you know that I know it. Moreover non destructive criticism is
always welcome.
Alejandro
