>> Allan Rae writes:
AR> On 23 Oct 1998, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
>> One point here is that a paragraph can only contain insets... so
>> I simplified a bit too much:
AR> I'm glad you remembered I was getting worried for a minute...
>> end after think a bit more about this...sectioning commands only
>> has _well defined_ meening at level 0 in the file:
>>
>> \begin_sectioning subsection \end_sectioning \begin_paragrap
>> \end_paragraph \beggin_sectioning Chapter \end_sectioning
>> \begin_paragraph \end_paragraph
AR> Why not:
AR> \begin_paragraph <params -- Chapter> <contents -- actual name of
AR> Chapter> \end_paragraph \begin_paragraph <params -- Standard>
AR> <contents -- a bunch of text> \end_paragraph
Well this is one of the choices we will have to make, is sectioning
commands paragraphs?
Personally I would like to have them as insets that are only allowed
on level 0. by using insets it is a lot easier to have context menus,
and setting of sectioning commands parameters. (short version, long
version)
AR> and so on. Or is that getting too close to internal format?
I don't have a problem with that...
Lgb