It's not too difficult once you get a hang of it. I was able to make a little bracket in FreeCAD after an hour or so of reading tutorials.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Peter Vollan <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes but there many who have a 3D printer but not a 3D scanner. You may > wish to skip the scanning part and start by modelling your thing in > CAD. > > > On 17 May 2015 at 20:57, Flow gmail <[email protected]> wrote: > > There are 1800 publicly available 3-D printing sites listed on the > > MakerBot.com site <https://www.3dhubs.com/3dprint> for individual jobs > at > > modest prices. > > > > Gene Corrigan > > [email protected] > > > > On May 17, 2015, at 9:00 PM, JIM FARLEY <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sounds like a job for a 3-D scanner and a 3-D printer. I do not have one > > (yet) but maybe a list member does. > > > > -- Jim > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Joe Grubbs <[email protected]> > > To: Bitchin100 <[email protected]> > > Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 5:19 PM > > Subject: Re: [M100] Model 200 battery cover > > > > Ugh. I'm like pedantic about this sort of stuff :P I put a piece of > tape > > on it for the time being, but it drives me nuts. Haha, hopefully someone > has > > one. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 17:16:28 -0400 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [M100] Model 200 battery cover > > > > Mine has broken twice. Rick Hanson was nice enough to send me one after > the > > first one broke, but that one broke too. I used tape to make mine hold. > It's > > not pretty, but it works. > > > > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Joe Grubbs <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Despite my best efforts to be gentle, my battery cover has finally > broken. > > Does anyone out there in Model T land have a non-broken 200 battery cover > > that they're itching to sell? > > > > > > > > > > > -- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) Thanks /usr/games/fortune
