anyone ever try photobucket?
On May 6, 2016 6:57 PM, "Duane Adrian" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> *Come on people. Everyone has the right to access any forum, list or
> FACEBOOK. *
>
>
> *Yes, some people might like the M100 list. Some people like FACEBOOK. Who
> really cares. *
>
> *Mike Stein and John Hogerhuis. You BOTH need to just respect what TRS 80
> Model 100 user do and what they access on the internet. M100 list  is not
> the "GOD M100 list" out there to access. Many people create webpages,
> Facebook groups and other related information pertaining to the TRS 80
> Model 100.*
>
> *Duane A.*
>
> From: "Mike Stein" <[email protected]>
> To: "Model 100 Discussion" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [M100] my Model 100 facebook group
> Message-ID: <A53A1031BE994AC4B2CCB38B481A759E@310e2>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Don't get your shorts in a knot, Gary; I merely said that it's a shame
> that he chose Facebook to host his pictures instead of one of the many
> other sites which do not require logging in and joining, thereby excluding
> a number of folks like myself from seeing and presumably enjoying what he
> has to show.
>
> Most people are aware that quite a few people will not or can not join
> Facebook, and when they want to share something with folks outside that
> walled garden they choose a universally accessible site instead.
>
> m
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Gary Weber
>   To: Model 100 Discussion
>   Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 9:41 PM
>   Subject: Re: [M100] my Model 100 facebook group
>
>
>   Wait, we're not really going to debate the merits of the existence of a
> Facebook group, are we?
>
>
>   Is the point that just because not *everyone* is on Facebook, people
> shouldn't create Facebook groups because it cannot include everyone?
>
>
>   Rubbish.  If the people already on Facebook want to have a group to talk
> about a certain topic, they should have that freedom.  Just like the people
> who are into HAM radio can have discussions across their own medium, that
> also excludes people that *DON'T* have a HAM license.
>

Reply via email to