I've often wanted to build a AA charging circuit into my 102. Or, even an
internal lithium battery - since I have a 150mA boost converter board lying
around that I never actually did anything with. Except that I'd still need
a charging circuit because the board I bought is boost-only and
boost+charge boards are readily available now.

*sigh*

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Brian White <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oh what a great idea using a cap.
>
> Not just that. I had already heard of doing that, but the caps discharge
> time is shorter than a battery, so I didn't really consider it a good
> answer except for the fun of trying it.
>
> But anyone can make themselves a REX now, and REX provides among other
> things, on-board full ram backups.
>
> capacitor + rex = win
>
> If you can easily take a snapshot of your entire ram, saved to the REX's
> flash, then it's no problem if the cap dies in a few days instead of a few
> weeks.
>
> Of course if you're willing to hack even more, sure you could rewire the
> AAs a little and add a real charging circuit, and have it so the AAs
> *always* charge the cap, and the wall power recharges the AAs without
> removing them, just like any modern device. Then you never have to touch
> the insides again, just the battery cover, and even that only every 5 years.
>
> But with the ability to make backups right on-board, you can get away with
> a simple in-place cap swap with no other mods.
>
> Not having to worry about leakers in a few years, or overcharging, would
> be nice.
>
> --
> bkw
>
> On May 31, 2017 10:08 PM, "Josh Malone" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:29 PM, John Gardner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> That's what it is in the 8201a too,  IIRC.  So if the rail is 5V the NiCD
>>>
>>> is seeing a charge current of ~ 3 mA - Which may explain some of the
>>>
>>> resurrections of dormant laptops after prolonged noodling around with
>>>
>>> them...
>>>
>>> Thanks for sharing!
>>>
>>>  ...
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/31/17, Josh Malone <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > The m100 techref schematic shows 1.6k (I think - it's an awful
>>> photocopy I
>>> > found online)
>>> >
>>> > https://dl.google.com/dl/androidjumper/mtp/502266/androidfil
>>> etransfer.dmg
>>>
>>>
>> D'oh! I completely posted the wrong link - meant to link to the m100
>> techref. Sorry
>>
>> In any case, 3mA is more-or-less C/20, so yeah, kindof a slow charge.
>>
>

Reply via email to