Hi,
  I have a not working Olivetti M10 and a Rigol DS1104Z oscilloscope, so I made 
few measurement to try to help Brian and in the mean time try to troubleshoot 
my unit.

My unit was working properly and stopped as soon as I flipped the NiCd battery 
switch off while the unit was ON (done by mistake with the cover open).
Now the screen turn on but I can regulate just the contrast and no text appear 
on the screen.
I also made a small arduino circuit to test the LCD alone, and I'm able to 
write text on it, so the LCD should be fine.

BTW I think Brian is using way too long ground leads on the oscilloscope probe.
I made my measurement clipping the alligator clip to the metal case of the main 
crystal that in the M10 is grounded with a pice of bare wire.
Is your scope grounded? I can see in one of your pictures the usual US plug 
with only 2 terminals...

Here are some screenshots of my measurements.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/8YSbaAxZBuXu5rjC2

Pictures:
1) CLK pin 37 of the 8085
2) Pin 7 of the 8085
3-4) CS Pin 20 of the ROM it seems to cycle over and over
5) Reset * at power on

VEE is 4.9V
V across the battery is 4.02 when the unit is on and 3.9 when off

Tomorrow I'll continue hoping Brian or some of you can confirm/compare some of 
my measurements.
Have a nice day
Ciao
  Mauro

NOTE: I think I will measure all the pins on the system bus so anyone with an 
oscilloscope can do the same without opening the unit case...





On Dec 11, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Fugu ME100 wrote:

> Ah the “special tool” requirement always hated to see that in any step…..
> 
> What did the –5V measure on the meter?  If it is not within spec neither the 
> LCD or buzzer will work.  
> 
> From: M100 <[email protected]> on behalf of Brian White 
> <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Sunday, December 10, 2017 at 11:30 PM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [M100] Fwd: Re: diagnose
> 
> Thanks for that tip.
> 
> And oh like some GM repair manuals where replacing an entire transmission 
> might be 11 steps, but one of them is to use the $12,000 machine no one 
> outside of the factory has ever even seen.
> 
> 
> On Dec 8, 2017 1:38 PM, "Fugu ME100" <[email protected]> wrote:
> It might be better to use the CLK (37) output as a reference if it is needed. 
>  The CLK is derived from the X1,X2 XTAL inputs and should not be impacted by 
> the loading of the scope probes.  
> 
> The M100 reference manual is quite good for troubleshooting some parts,  
> although it does have a few broad instructions like “Check All IC’s”.    :-)
> 
> From: M100 <[email protected]> on behalf of Brian White 
> <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 9:55 AM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [M100] Fwd: Re: diagnose
> 
> I noticed something a couple days ago. Those noisy gnd and 5v lines were only 
> like that because I happened to have probes on both X1 and X2 at the same 
> time.
> 
> Later I was looking at a good M100, and happened to only be watching X1 and 
> others but not X2, and everything was much better. But just by touching a 
> probe to X2 while another was on X1, both gnd and 5v went exactly like those 
> pics I posted from the bad M100. I can probe either X1 or X2 and it's fine, 
> but not bith at the same time.
> 
> I don't actually see any special reason to monitor either of those signals 
> except briefly to verify they exist, or to provide something steady to 
> trigger on while probing others. Just pointing out something I saw that 
> explains those ugly traces.
> 
> On Dec 7, 2017 11:45 AM, "Josh Malone" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah - there is something very weird with the ground on that Tandy.
> Maybe some problematic traces? Or a bad IC leaking current to ground?
> 
> Can you measure the DC power consumption? It should be ~60-70mA IIRC.
> 
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Brian White <[email protected]> wrote:
> > After watching a youtube video about how to use an oscilloscope by sparkfun,
> > I switched all probes and channels to 10x and adjusted the trim caps in the
> > probes against the built in test signal to make the square wave look square.
> >
> > With gnd ref on the cpu gnd pin 20 instead of chassis gnd, and a couple
> > probes on X1 and reset_in, and one probe on chassis ground, now the x1 and
> > reset_in signals are steady, reset_in looks flatter, and only the trace for
> > chassis ground floats and bobs up and down now.
> >
> > So chassis ground simply floats around in relation to the rest of the board,
> > or at least in relation to the cpu. Not a bad afe in the scope. *chagrin*
> >
> >
> > --
> > bkw
> >
> > On Dec 6, 2017 7:38 PM, "Brian White" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is the bobbing I was talking about. It's dumb for me to even be
> >> talking about it yet since I haven't even done a basic comparison check on
> >> some other reference yet.
> >>
> >> https://youtu.be/b9jAYsfTOzQ
> >>
> >> And here's another look at a different signal hooked up a different way.
> >> Here, I have the ground ref hooked to the gnd pin 20 on the 8085, NOT the
> >> chassis ground. And CH4 is on pin 18, AD6. The offsets, trigger, and
> >> vertical scales are all visible on-screen.
> >>
> >> https://photos.app.goo.gl/mel4CKym2EtcV1352
> >>
> >> https://photos.app.goo.gl/K1AIj3Pmt15xXfR72
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> bkw
> >>
> >

Reply via email to