Actually the reset is moving only at power on and when I press the reset 
button, otherwise it is stable. I tried to follow the reset signal after the 
Reset out of the CPU through couple of buffers but it is consistent and not 
cycling. 

As LA I only have a Saleae 8 clone, but should do the job. 
I'll try the address and data lines as suggested. 
Any other signal of interest I should trace?

Mauro




Sent from my iPad

On 15/dic/2017, at 01:12, Fugu ME100 <[email protected]> wrote:

> What is the RESET line into the CPU doing during the loops?  Is the RESET 
> stable? 
> 
> The CPU appears to be RESET, heads to the ROM for data but for some reason 
> fails to complete and RESETs itself.   No activity on the RAM or LCD would 
> indicate the CPU is not completing the ROM boot.  At this point I would 
> usually hang on my Logic Analyzer to see where the Address and Data lines are 
> heading.  
> 
> Have you checked out the Address Lines and Data Lines to make sure none are 
> stuck at either 0, 1 or some other state?  They all should show some activity 
> during a RESET.  
> 
> From: M100 <[email protected]> on behalf of Mauro Pintus 
> <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 3:55 PM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [M100] diagnose
> 
> Thank you Fugu and Brian for the feedback.
> 
> Yes I tried the beep BASIC test with no luck and also the cold start (the M10 
> and the M100 are almost identical...).
> 
> I made few other measurements trying to replicate what Brian is doing and for 
> sure the unit is in a loop...
> 
> In the linked google photo album I added another picture (the first one) 
> showing the ROM CS (Pin 20 yellow trace) and the IO/M of the main processor 
> (Pin 34 blue trace)
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/8YSbaAxZBuXu5rjC2
> 
> As you can see at the beginning of the repeted sequence, I get only 5 pulses 
> on the IO/M
> 
> The strange thing is that there is so little activity on the RAM CEx (chip 
> enable), like nothing is loaded.
> 
> Finally I measured also the CSx (chip select) on the LCD connector and none 
> are moving, confirming that on the LCD nothing can be displayed.
> 
> Mauro
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 7:01 AM, Fugu ME100 wrote:
> 
>> Vee at –4.9V is good.  
>> 
>> You may have already looked at these options, so apologies if you have…
>> 
>> The repetitive nature of the ROM CS cycling could be the CPU in a software 
>> loop waiting for keyboard input.   Have you tried the BEEP test from BASIC 
>> to see if the motherboard is actually running?  
>> 
>> Have you tried a cold start?  On the M100 press ctrl+pause while powering 
>> on, not sure about the M10.  It could be the memory is corrupted with the 
>> loss of backup power.  Always a good idea when first powering after 
>> switching off/on the backup power..
>> 
>> 
>> From: M100 <[email protected]> on behalf of Mauro Pintus 
>> <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 5:24 PM
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [M100] diagnose
>> 
>> Hi,
>>   I have a not working Olivetti M10 and a Rigol DS1104Z oscilloscope, so I 
>> made few measurement to try to help Brian and in the mean time try to 
>> troubleshoot my unit.
>> 
>> My unit was working properly and stopped as soon as I flipped the NiCd 
>> battery switch off while the unit was ON (done by mistake with the cover 
>> open).
>> Now the screen turn on but I can regulate just the contrast and no text 
>> appear on the screen.
>> I also made a small arduino circuit to test the LCD alone, and I'm able to 
>> write text on it, so the LCD should be fine.
>> 
>> BTW I think Brian is using way too long ground leads on the oscilloscope 
>> probe.
>> I made my measurement clipping the alligator clip to the metal case of the 
>> main crystal that in the M10 is grounded with a pice of bare wire.
>> Is your scope grounded? I can see in one of your pictures the usual US plug 
>> with only 2 terminals...
>> 
>> Here are some screenshots of my measurements.
>> 
>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/8YSbaAxZBuXu5rjC2
>> 
>> Pictures:
>> 1) CLK pin 37 of the 8085
>> 2) Pin 7 of the 8085
>> 3-4) CS Pin 20 of the ROM it seems to cycle over and over
>> 5) Reset * at power on
>> 
>> VEE is 4.9V
>> V across the battery is 4.02 when the unit is on and 3.9 when off
>> 
>> Tomorrow I'll continue hoping Brian or some of you can confirm/compare some 
>> of my measurements.
>> Have a nice day
>> Ciao
>>   Mauro
>> 
>> NOTE: I think I will measure all the pins on the system bus so anyone with 
>> an oscilloscope can do the same without opening the unit case...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 11, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Fugu ME100 wrote:
>> 
>>> Ah the “special tool” requirement always hated to see that in any step…..
>>> 
>>> What did the –5V measure on the meter?  If it is not within spec neither 
>>> the LCD or buzzer will work.  
>>> 
>>> From: M100 <[email protected]> on behalf of Brian White 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Sunday, December 10, 2017 at 11:30 PM
>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Fwd: Re: diagnose
>>> 
>>> Thanks for that tip.
>>> 
>>> And oh like some GM repair manuals where replacing an entire transmission 
>>> might be 11 steps, but one of them is to use the $12,000 machine no one 
>>> outside of the factory has ever even seen.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Dec 8, 2017 1:38 PM, "Fugu ME100" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> It might be better to use the CLK (37) output as a reference if it is 
>>>> needed.  The CLK is derived from the X1,X2 XTAL inputs and should not be 
>>>> impacted by the loading of the scope probes.  
>>>> 
>>>> The M100 reference manual is quite good for troubleshooting some parts,  
>>>> although it does have a few broad instructions like “Check All IC’s”.    
>>>> :-)
>>>> 
>>>> From: M100 <[email protected]> on behalf of Brian White 
>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 9:55 AM
>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Fwd: Re: diagnose
>>>> 
>>>> I noticed something a couple days ago. Those noisy gnd and 5v lines were 
>>>> only like that because I happened to have probes on both X1 and X2 at the 
>>>> same time.
>>>> 
>>>> Later I was looking at a good M100, and happened to only be watching X1 
>>>> and others but not X2, and everything was much better. But just by 
>>>> touching a probe to X2 while another was on X1, both gnd and 5v went 
>>>> exactly like those pics I posted from the bad M100. I can probe either X1 
>>>> or X2 and it's fine, but not bith at the same time.
>>>> 
>>>> I don't actually see any special reason to monitor either of those signals 
>>>> except briefly to verify they exist, or to provide something steady to 
>>>> trigger on while probing others. Just pointing out something I saw that 
>>>> explains those ugly traces.
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 7, 2017 11:45 AM, "Josh Malone" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Yeah - there is something very weird with the ground on that Tandy.
>>>>> Maybe some problematic traces? Or a bad IC leaking current to ground?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can you measure the DC power consumption? It should be ~60-70mA IIRC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Brian White <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> > After watching a youtube video about how to use an oscilloscope by 
>>>>> > sparkfun,
>>>>> > I switched all probes and channels to 10x and adjusted the trim caps in 
>>>>> > the
>>>>> > probes against the built in test signal to make the square wave look 
>>>>> > square.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > With gnd ref on the cpu gnd pin 20 instead of chassis gnd, and a couple
>>>>> > probes on X1 and reset_in, and one probe on chassis ground, now the x1 
>>>>> > and
>>>>> > reset_in signals are steady, reset_in looks flatter, and only the trace 
>>>>> > for
>>>>> > chassis ground floats and bobs up and down now.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > So chassis ground simply floats around in relation to the rest of the 
>>>>> > board,
>>>>> > or at least in relation to the cpu. Not a bad afe in the scope. 
>>>>> > *chagrin*
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > bkw
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Dec 6, 2017 7:38 PM, "Brian White" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> This is the bobbing I was talking about. It's dumb for me to even be
>>>>> >> talking about it yet since I haven't even done a basic comparison 
>>>>> >> check on
>>>>> >> some other reference yet.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> https://youtu.be/b9jAYsfTOzQ
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> And here's another look at a different signal hooked up a different 
>>>>> >> way.
>>>>> >> Here, I have the ground ref hooked to the gnd pin 20 on the 8085, NOT 
>>>>> >> the
>>>>> >> chassis ground. And CH4 is on pin 18, AD6. The offsets, trigger, and
>>>>> >> vertical scales are all visible on-screen.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> https://photos.app.goo.gl/mel4CKym2EtcV1352
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> https://photos.app.goo.gl/K1AIj3Pmt15xXfR72
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> bkw
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
> 

Reply via email to