There is a model 600 for sale at a good price on eBay, but I'm kind of hesitant. It seems to be quite the oddball model in the series. Does anyone have experience with it?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 6:34 AM Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm just surprised that something as minor as attribution got you riled up > - should have put your name(s) on the silkscreen. Your comment about side > deal also struck me as a bit surprising - Oshpark is based on free sharing. > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 2:03 AM Brian White <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It was public from the beginning. Jayeson made it after I asked on FB if >> anyone could/would do so. I sent him the interface information and a >> working original sample, and eventually a whole not-quite-working model 600 >> as a gift (shipping to AU was worth a lot more than the M600 even if it was >> fully working), and after a couple revisions he emailed me gerbers as well >> as created the >> oshpark entry, I built a set and tested them in a working M600, alone and >> combined with an original module in the same machine, and found no >> problems, posted some pics of my completed units and gave Jayeson permision >> to use them in his oshpark entry. I asked if someone wanted to design it >> under some form of open source license right from the outset. Didn't have >> to be public domain. I actually would have liked gpl or some version of >> cc-with-attribution myself, but public domain is certainly "gpl or free-er". >> >> I already articulated the concern, and the lowness of it's level, as >> clearly as I could. What part of "They are not violating any actual >> laws, because this pcb design is explicitly placed in the public domain. >> It's just that it would be at least minimally considerate to give a little >> attribution where they got something from." failed at that? >> >> It ain't the end of the world, but does something have to be the end of >> the world to talk about it? >> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:11 PM Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Never mind. I see the fine print now. >>> >>> So..... it is now public. What is the concern? Someone is >>> commercializing it. Price is less than oshpark. Sounds like a gòod thing. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Monday, February 25, 2019, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> How waa the design explicitly placed in the public domain? Juat >>>> curious. De facto via oshpark? >>>> >>>> The 2nd one not mine. >>>> >>>> On Monday, February 25, 2019, Brian White <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is this somebody here, or does anyone recogize or know them? >>>>> http://ebay.com/itm/113662788499/ >>>>> >>>>> They are not violating any actual laws, because this pcb design is >>>>> explicitly placed in the public domain. It's just that it would be at >>>>> least >>>>> minimally considerate to give a little attribution where they got >>>>> something >>>>> from. >>>>> >>>>> They even (re)used the pictures right from the original oshpark >>>>> listing: >>>>> https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/8HMgno1x >>>>> >>>>> The designer (and oshpark account) is Jayeson Lee-Steere and the >>>>> oshpark pics came from me. >>>>> The ebay seller is not Jayeson nor does he know them, so it's not a >>>>> deal he set up with the seller. >>>>> >>>>> Same seller: >>>>> http://ebay.com/itm/113662802362/ >>>>> and the origin: >>>>> https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/V0tpeuMg >>>>> >>>>> That one actually says copyright right on it. I believe this one is >>>>> Steven Adolph right? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> bkw >>>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> bkw >> >
