I had 2 at one point. I liked the challenge of getting it working but in the end I didn't have a use relative to the M100. I felt similarly about the DVI. Had 2 but got passed them along eventually. A bit too big, bulky, heavy etc.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:19 AM Tom Dison <[email protected]> wrote: > There is a model 600 for sale at a good price on eBay, but I'm kind of > hesitant. It seems to be quite the oddball model in the series. Does anyone > have experience with it? > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 6:34 AM Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm just surprised that something as minor as attribution got you riled >> up - should have put your name(s) on the silkscreen. Your comment about >> side deal also struck me as a bit surprising - Oshpark is based on free >> sharing. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 2:03 AM Brian White <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It was public from the beginning. Jayeson made it after I asked on FB if >>> anyone could/would do so. I sent him the interface information and a >>> working original sample, and eventually a whole not-quite-working model 600 >>> as a gift (shipping to AU was worth a lot more than the M600 even if it was >>> fully working), and after a couple revisions he emailed me gerbers as well >>> as created the >>> oshpark entry, I built a set and tested them in a working M600, alone >>> and combined with an original module in the same machine, and found no >>> problems, posted some pics of my completed units and gave Jayeson permision >>> to use them in his oshpark entry. I asked if someone wanted to design it >>> under some form of open source license right from the outset. Didn't have >>> to be public domain. I actually would have liked gpl or some version of >>> cc-with-attribution myself, but public domain is certainly "gpl or free-er". >>> >>> I already articulated the concern, and the lowness of it's level, as >>> clearly as I could. What part of "They are not violating any actual >>> laws, because this pcb design is explicitly placed in the public domain. >>> It's just that it would be at least minimally considerate to give a little >>> attribution where they got something from." failed at that? >>> >>> It ain't the end of the world, but does something have to be the end of >>> the world to talk about it? >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:11 PM Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Never mind. I see the fine print now. >>>> >>>> So..... it is now public. What is the concern? Someone is >>>> commercializing it. Price is less than oshpark. Sounds like a gòod thing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Monday, February 25, 2019, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> How waa the design explicitly placed in the public domain? Juat >>>>> curious. De facto via oshpark? >>>>> >>>>> The 2nd one not mine. >>>>> >>>>> On Monday, February 25, 2019, Brian White <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Is this somebody here, or does anyone recogize or know them? >>>>>> http://ebay.com/itm/113662788499/ >>>>>> >>>>>> They are not violating any actual laws, because this pcb design is >>>>>> explicitly placed in the public domain. It's just that it would be at >>>>>> least >>>>>> minimally considerate to give a little attribution where they got >>>>>> something >>>>>> from. >>>>>> >>>>>> They even (re)used the pictures right from the original oshpark >>>>>> listing: >>>>>> https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/8HMgno1x >>>>>> >>>>>> The designer (and oshpark account) is Jayeson Lee-Steere and the >>>>>> oshpark pics came from me. >>>>>> The ebay seller is not Jayeson nor does he know them, so it's not a >>>>>> deal he set up with the seller. >>>>>> >>>>>> Same seller: >>>>>> http://ebay.com/itm/113662802362/ >>>>>> and the origin: >>>>>> https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/V0tpeuMg >>>>>> >>>>>> That one actually says copyright right on it. I believe this one is >>>>>> Steven Adolph right? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> bkw >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> bkw >>> >>
