Which capacitors in particular did you replace?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 2:21 AM Jim Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My first M100 died on me about two years ago with a problem where the VEE
> supply voltage is low (between -1.4 and -1.7 volts, instead of the expected
> -5v).  At the time I posted here and the best guesses centered around one
> or more bad capacitors, particularly C85.  I did get around to removing C85
> at the time and it did have a tiny amount of fuzzy crud on the bottom
> around the leads.  I put the whole thing aside and swapped in a motherboard
> from another parts machine.
>
> Fast forward to this year, after continuously putting off ordering the
> capacitors from digikey, I finally ordered several capacitor replacement
> kits and nimh memory batteries from arcadeshopper and today sat down to
> re-cap this motherboard.  Well, it seems maybe I should have started with a
> different machine because all I've done is blow a few hours and frustrate
> myself.  I checked after replacing C85 and VEE was still only -1.7 volts,
> so I soldiered on in the vain hope that maybe another bad cap was at fault
> - replaced all the caps and sure enough it was still only -1.7 volts when I
> was done.  :(
>
> VDD is correct (+4.97 volts) and the memory nimh is charging when power is
> connected (voltage at the battery rises).  I'm testing the motherboard
> without the lcd or keyboard connected as I'm pretty sure it's supposed to
> be able to make -5v on VEE without those components connected...
>
> I'm not really familiar with expected diode test values, but to give you
> guys some additional info to go on (in case any of these are bad) I lifted
> one end on each of D13, D14, and D15 to test them, measured 0.22, 0.73, and
> 0.54 volts forward drop respectively and open circuit in reverse.  I don't
> know if those are appropriate values.  I also checked R97 and it is 180
> ohms as expected.
>
> Help!!!  I feel like I've been banging my head against the wall all
> evening.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         jim
>
>

Reply via email to