> On Oct 6, 2022, at 9:04 AM, Brian White <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I think I've seen BASIC 80 before but couldn't say where so it might be
> imagination.
BASIC-80 is, as best as I'm aware, the product name of the various Microsoft
BASIC implementations for 8080 and Z80. It's documented with that name in this
manual which also refers to BASIC-86 which might be presumed to refer to the
8086 implementation:
https://ia800708.us.archive.org/8/items/BASIC-80_MBASIC_Reference_Manual/BASIC-80_MBASIC_Reference_Manual_text.pdf
As such, I think it would be reasonable to call the BASIC interpreter itself on
the T "BASIC-80", although the OS is obviously more than just the included
BASIC.