Hi, 

 

There is also GoogleGroups … I’m a member of a few of them for computer 
discussions.  

 

https://groups.google.com/

 

 

 

 

 

==============================================================================================
C U L8r,  °|°  Walt Perko  °|°        "Kids ... teach them the good stuff, and 
they still learn the bad stuff on their own."

http://www.R2Pv1.com/  RoboGuts™ Intelligent content for 3D printing making 
S.T.E.A.M. education better, easier and more affordable  

 

Experiments to learn how to use various Electronic Components, Structured 
Computer Programming, Phonemes for Speech &Song in any language, and Art.


                         "The World Needs a New Economic Model"
==============================================================================================



            Sent from the Cyber7 

 

 

From: M100 <[email protected]> On Behalf Of John R. Hogerhuis
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 2:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [M100] Dreamhost dropping discussion lists

 

 

 

On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 2:33 PM B 9 <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 5:27 PM Daryl Tester 
<[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

On 20/6/26 04:40, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:

> Every time I get burned by SAAS my tendency is to assert more control.
> It might also be because I'm a cheapskate.

I can't speak about the latter 🙂, but definitely the former.  Yahoo
Groups, G+, all the others.  It's "fine" while you serve their
interests, until you no longer do.

This group is about preserving and recovering information pertaining to
a particular niche bit of computing; it would be a shame to throw that
away (yet the companies don't care).

 

John, are you willing to consider having the mailing list separate from the 
wiki and cloud-t?

 

There is an organization that hosts mailing lists for the express purpose of 
keeping information open to all, https://freelists.org/. As the name implies, 
they are not in it for the money. My first thought when I heard about them was, 
if it's not a business, how <https://www.freelists.org/wiki/will_it_last>  will 
it last? Of course, in hindsight, they're the ones who are still here (since 
the year 2000!) while the other services are gone. 

 

Freelists is not using Mailman but some other thing that looks old but easy 
enough. You can have multiple "list owners" so it would be trivial to transfer 
ownership, if the need arises. Subscribers can add and remove themselves from 
the list. Archives are automatically created. (For example, here's the archive 
of a list for visually impaired programmers 
<https://www.freelists.org/archive/program-l/> ). Unlike the "free sample" 
lists from the commercial offerings like gaggle.com <http://gaggle.com> , there 
is no limit on the number of subscribers. The main downside of freelists seems 
to be that the maximum size of a single message is 5 MB. (Do we even get 
messages that long here?)

 

The process for creating a new list is a single, simple form 
<https://www.freelists.org/signup.html> . All new lists are first checked by a 
human to make sure they are reasonable. I tried it just now as a test. Unless 
John rules it out, I'll let everyone know how long it takes a freelists 
volunteer to get back to me. I'll also report on their list manager interface — 
can it do the things I expect John might want, like importing the current 
subscribers and archives? If that all looks good, I'll probe into how resilient 
their organization is; are they a team or just some clown who might run away to 
join the circus at any moment?

 

—b9

 

 

Current plan is to move to a Kamatera server that I already had sitting unused, 
Daryl Tester is working on it. Idea is to migrate to same software, migrate the 
user list and archives.

 

The mailing list will move first, and then the wiki/cloudt etc.

 

There are many solutions that would work. As to team versus clown, the main 
thing is it's a clown you trust.

 

I do maintain a message size limit default, many of you have run into it. It 
has gradually increased from 64K ;-)  The larger sizes being for direct 
attachments. I think it's around 1mb now, they get oversized because of members 
responding to digest mails or adding direct photo attachments.

 

-- John. 

Reply via email to