Thanks guys

-- John.

On Mon, Oct 19, 2026, 8:39 PM Gary Weber <[email protected]> wrote:

> Kurt's scan is in three parts:
>
> https://www.web8201.net/Files/LIBRARY_web8201/nec8201_techref_pt1.pdf,
> https://www.web8201.net/Files/LIBRARY_web8201/nec8201_techref_pt2.pdf,
> https://www.web8201.net/Files/LIBRARY_web8201/nec8201_techref_pt3.pdf
>
> And yes these are getting uploaded to archive.org, along with all of the
> other PDFs I have fro the various other manuals.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 7:44 PM B9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I suggest uploading to archive.org as a start.
>>
>> --b9
>>
>>
>> On October 19, 2026 6:54:45 PM PDT, Kurt McCullum <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I've just finished scanning the manual but it's just over 36 megs in
>>> size. I need to figure out where to upload it, but when I do I will send
>>> the links.
>>>
>>> Kurt
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2026, at 9:41 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it was Kurt McCullum that had a clean copy...
>>>
>>> I need the following pages from the NEC tech ref:
>>>
>>>  Pg 77, 78, 79, 97, 99, 105, 177, 119, 191, 198, 210, 211, 228
>>>
>>> What I am working on is a very accurate OCR with good formatting of the
>>> ASCII art and accurate content for all assembly listings, etc. I'm using
>>> gemma4:31b on a local rig to do the conversions to ASCII and ultimately
>>> .md. My current purpose is informing the AI as to low level access to file
>>> system etc for it to generate VirtualT socket tests for Gary's port of
>>> SuperROM.
>>>
>>> The AI is doing  a much better ocr of the content than the PDF has. It
>>> is doing an excellent job. Even at ASCII art. Sometimes hallucinating
>>> portions of diagrams that aren't there, which is bizarre. And it keeps
>>> stopping and needing to be kicked to continue working. Even so it will save
>>> me a lot of time and we will all have a more tractable version of the
>>> content, ultimately.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -- John.
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to