I tried cleaning it up a bit. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lrG5xFYHzFkpzP9aIkPClPZplgM7CVsL/view?usp=sharing
> On Oct 19, 2026, at 10:39 PM, Gary Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > > Kurt's scan is in three parts: > > https://www.web8201.net/Files/LIBRARY_web8201/nec8201_techref_pt1.pdf, > https://www.web8201.net/Files/LIBRARY_web8201/nec8201_techref_pt2.pdf, > https://www.web8201.net/Files/LIBRARY_web8201/nec8201_techref_pt3.pdf > > And yes these are getting uploaded to archive.org <http://archive.org/>, > along with all of the other PDFs I have fro the various other manuals. > > Gary > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 7:44 PM B9 <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> I suggest uploading to archive.org <http://archive.org/> as a start. >> >> --b9 >> >> >> On October 19, 2026 6:54:45 PM PDT, Kurt McCullum <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> I've just finished scanning the manual but it's just over 36 megs in size. >>> I need to figure out where to upload it, but when I do I will send the >>> links. >>> >>> Kurt >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2026, at 9:41 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: >>>> I think it was Kurt McCullum that had a clean copy... >>>> >>>> I need the following pages from the NEC tech ref: >>>> >>>> Pg 77, 78, 79, 97, 99, 105, 177, 119, 191, 198, 210, 211, 228 >>>> >>>> What I am working on is a very accurate OCR with good formatting of the >>>> ASCII art and accurate content for all assembly listings, etc. I'm using >>>> gemma4:31b on a local rig to do the conversions to ASCII and ultimately >>>> .md. My current purpose is informing the AI as to low level access to file >>>> system etc for it to generate VirtualT socket tests for Gary's port of >>>> SuperROM. >>>> >>>> The AI is doing a much better ocr of the content than the PDF has. It is >>>> doing an excellent job. Even at ASCII art. Sometimes hallucinating >>>> portions of diagrams that aren't there, which is bizarre. And it keeps >>>> stopping and needing to be kicked to continue working. Even so it will >>>> save me a lot of time and we will all have a more tractable version of the >>>> content, ultimately. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> -- John.
