I'm happy with that too.
I like copyToGuest and copyFromGuest.
Gabe
Nathan Binkert wrote:
Just to clarify: it's using BaseBufferArg::copyIn() and not
VirtualPort::CopyIn(), right? I just noticed that these are two
different functions with totally opposite semantics (explaining Ali's
earlier confusion).
Perhaps we should rename copyin/copyout to either
copyToHost/copyToGuest, copyHostToGuest/copyGuestToHost, or
copyM5ToGuest/copyGuestToM5
Nate
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
