I'm far from being a Juju expect, but as I can see zookeeper is a build dependancy of juju right?
debhelper (>= 7.0.50~) > help2man > python > python-apt > python-oauth > python-pydot > python-twisted > python-txaws > python-txzookeeper (>= 0.9.5~) > python-yaml > zookeeper With my current setup I have 6 nodes ready but at the end I have a lot of issues with juju. The environment is well bootstrapped but the juju status show ssh errors. I never configured zookeeper maybe, that the problem. I never was able to have more than one node in the `allocated to maas` state. It quite random. Cheers! On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Dafang Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm still not quite sure why your MAAS provisioning doesn't have the > prompt without a default route if your bare metal only has one NIC. Your > bare metal install must somehow have found a default route in the network > settings, I guess. > > I used a dedicated node mainly is because I didn't know it would be > possible to use the MAAS/juju node as the zookeeper node. From this MAAS > wiki page - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/MAAS/Juju, it requests to > have at least two nodes added to MAAS to start to use juju. To my > understanding, one node is for Zookeeper node, another is for any possible > juju service node. The Zookeeper node was automatically provisioned by > MAAS (well, except the manual answer to the network configuration screen > due to the absence of a default route, and also, the manual answer to the > name server, which is the IP address of the MAAS/juju node). Can you share > with me how you managed to have maas/juju/zookeeper loaded in one node? > > Best, > Dafang > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Sébastien Han <[email protected]> > *To:* Dafang Zhang <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Julian Edwards <[email protected]>; " > [email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, May 6, 2012 3:36 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Maas-devel] Cobbler Replacement (?) > > Ok, I see. > I also have one issue with the preseed file in my bare metal setup. > > May 2 14:41:00 ubuntu partman: No matching physical volumes found > May 2 14:41:00 ubuntu partman: No volume groups found > May 2 14:41:00 ubuntu partman: Reading all physical volumes. This may > take a while... > May 2 14:41:00 ubuntu partman-lvm: No volume groups found > > > During the installation I have to manually choose a disk to install the > system... > > My bare metal setup is mainly the same as the virtual setup except that I > only use *one* NIC for the MAAS node. > But the weirdest think is that I have the exact same trace in the node of > my virtual setup. And I'm not ask for choose a disk in the virtual setup... > > One more thing why do you use a dedicated node for zookeeper? > > Cheers! > > > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Dafang Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Sebastien, > > Thanks for looking into this. You are correct that I only enabled the > Host-Only interface in VirtualBox, but I did user maas-dhcp package to > enable the MAAS node to manage DNS and DHCP. In a real-world scenario, all > the service nodes would sit behind the maas/juju node, so that they will > only have one NIC (or a team) to communicate with the MAAS node only, and > use the MAAS node's squid as the proxy to communicate with the rest of the > world. I could have the service node VM's to have two NIC's, but I > intended to set it up this way to mimic a scenario that would secure the > service nodes (in your term, MAASlave nodes). > > When I setup the MAAS node, I put two NIC's on it, one NAT (communicate > with the Net), another Host-Only (communicate with the zookeeper node and > all other service nodes). I used a preseed URL to automate the MAAS node > base ubuntu install. I don't have this issue with the MAAS node install. > > So, I only have this issue when I use MAAS to provision the service nodes, > each has just one NIC. I don't know why "setting netcfg/no_default_route" > is not working. > > Back to your bare metal setup, sounds like you have only 1 private NIC for > your bare metal, so you don't have the issue that needs to manually answer > the prompts during the OS provisioning? > > Best, > Dafang > > > > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maas-devel Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maas-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
