Le 13/06/2012 10:18, Gavin Panella a écrit : >> I forgot to say that the goal of this email is to gather feedback about >> this code reorganisation. I think this will ease the packaging work a >> bit but I'd be particularly interested to hear from the packaging guys >> if they think there is any problem with the proposed reorg. > > I'm losing enthusiasm for a big move, now that it's apparent that > South imposes some restrictions on us. I /now/ think we should leave > things as they are, except to move apiclient to maas.apiclient or > something like that. Sorry for flip-flopping on this.
See, that's precisely why I think the reorg is worth it: 'maas' is the Django project and nothing should go in there. That's indeed the problem this reorg wants to tackle: we have no single 'maas' python module where to put things. > 2. We may discover a workaround for the South restrictions before we > get around to moving anything. I suggest doing things the other way around: reorg the structure and then see if we can also rename the 2 existing Django applications using South. R. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maas-devel Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maas-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
