On 13 June 2012 09:28, Raphaël Badin <[email protected]> wrote: ... > See, that's precisely why I think the reorg is worth it: 'maas' is the > Django project and nothing should go in there. That's indeed the > problem this reorg wants to tackle: we have no single 'maas' python > module where to put things.
So, something like: maas -> maasapp, but off the default sys.path. * -> maas.* ? I think that's good, but we probably want to find out how namespace packages are handled by packagers. If parts of maas.* are packaged separately, for example, each package will want to install /usr/share/pyshared/maas and /usr/share/pyshared/maas/__init__.py, creating conflicts. > >> 2. We may discover a workaround for the South restrictions before we >> get around to moving anything. > > I suggest doing things the other way around: reorg the structure and > then see if we can also rename the 2 existing Django applications using > South. Yeah, I suppose that's good too. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maas-devel Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maas-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
