Hello Chris Did you actually read my message? I have both Fusion and Parallels Desktop 6 installed. I did a side-by-side comparison.
Lynne On 17 Sep 2011, at 14:47, Chris Moore wrote: • Parallels is much faster when it comes to 3D graphics and gaming. Parallels will probably always be faster as it does not do virtualisation in the same way Fusion does, it actually uses the Macs hardware directly, hence the faster graphics performance. As most of us blind folks are not graphic intensive gamers it is not a major issue. <--- Mac Access At Mac Access Dot Net ---> To reply to this post, please address your message to [email protected] You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Mac-Access forum at either the list's own dedicated web archive: <http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/mac-access/index.html> or at the public Mail Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>. Subscribe to the list's RSS feed from: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml> The Mac-Access mailing list is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus and worm-free! Please remember to update your membership options periodically by visiting the list website at: <http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/mac-access/options/>
