Pavel Janík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But now I finally know who wanted to get something out even if not > finished in our CVS. And this also makes me really calm about the > timelines, because the timeline was used (together with mav_eric's > stupid "codename Neo" argument) as an argument to send something out, > if not finished/prepared correctly. > Hi Pavel,
just for the record, and as I was among those favoring an early preview: do you object on the grounds of this being against established process rules, or do you really think it was too early quality-wise (which is a slippery slope, surely, because quality will always get better if one waits some more...)? Cheers, -- Thorsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
