Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Jason, *,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Jason Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know this is not an official QA response,
But I was looking for a QA-Rep, not only for comments.
Why do you think it is not an official "QA response"/what is missing
in your opinion?
Well, I see how to add myself as a QA-Rep in EIS, but I don't see my ID
on the list, so I hesitate to just type myself in.
It does look good to me, and if you need someone to sign off on it, and
if I am considered qualified, then I'll gladly put my name in as QA-Rep.
Thing is, I only built it on Leopard Intel, so I can't say if there
would be problems on another arch.
but the changes in
cws_dev300_cloph11 look good to me, and it builds just fine.
ciao
Christian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
